OK, I like Obama… he looks like a dude you could trust to runa country, and I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt here. If he’s not corrupt then he is definitely a pawn for the big corporations.

I don’t understand why he got a peace prize? For taking troops out of Iraq and putting them into Afghanistan? That doesn’t really equal peace does it? Especially because doing this is completely self serving for OPEC and other corrupt organisations.

You see, now that they have stopped Saddam drilling his own oil to use for his own country (like he watched the UAE do), they need to secure Afghanistan to allow a oil and gas pipeline to run through the country.

To run a pipeline through the country they need to get rid of the Taliban because they’re not really down with a pipeline. That is one of the supporting factors of 9/11 being a false flag operation. Talks with the Taliban about putting a pipeline through were breaking down before 9/11. A war on terror (and the Taliban) was a perfect excuse to take out those standing in the way of the pipeline. Not to mention the fact that the Taliban had destroyed all the poppy fields slowing the supply of heroin into America, and thus slowing the need for drug war spending (this is bad, the law enforcement agencies would lose their jobs with no drugs/users to confiscate/apprehend).

So back to the point of the of the story… it would seem Obama is sending US troops back into Afghanistan to make sure the Taliban are kept down. This in turn allows for a stable country for a pipeline to carry oil and gas from the resource rich countries north of Afghanistan, down to the sea for American ships to take as they please.

The problem here is that the country is not stable. Even if the Taliban are kept down, the country is in pretty bad shape since America invaded. Infrastructure and housing are needed and all promised aid has not arrived. This makes for desperate people living in poverty, and they are going to grow up angry at America because they dropped bombs on their houses and didn’t repair them.

Which is completely understandable right? If America invaded my country I would be fighting back. Some would label that being a terrorist, but I would label that being terrorized. America are the real terrorists in this world.

So basically it all comes back to greedy oil companies taking valuable resources from smaller countries that can’t protect themselves, with the help of the American Government/Army (aka Terrorists/Bullies), under the veil of The War On Terror. With utter disregard for the deaths of soldiers and civilians – they just want their money.

You got that? The only terrorist threat comes from America… everyone else is just a desperate patriot trying to fight back against the military industrial complex that has targeted their country and is stealing their resources.

Patriots exist in places other than the USA you know…

So, anyone seen that report that came out today?

US report predicts nuclear or biological attack by 2013

What a load of SHIT!

First tip-off: “US report predicts”

What, is the US Govt some kind of global authority on terrorism now? So what, they got attacked, so did lots of other places. They fucked up Iraq, they fucked up Afghanistan, they fucked up catching Bin Laden (if you even believe he was the one responsible). This is just another mass scaremongering technique to terrorize the public into complacency – cos when the public is scared, they’re easy to control – its called the Shock Doctrine, or Distaster Capitalism.

Second tip-off: “The six-month inquiry singles out Pakistan as one of the likeliest sources of such an attack”

O RLY? How convenient. The country that “Al Qeida” (if they are even real) are hiding in, and slip in and out of Afghanistan from. Throw into that the fact that the terrorists that attacked Mumbai are conveniently from Pakistan (not CIA agents in a CIA orchestrated operation to make Pakistan look like a terrorist haven so they can invade?). The US Govt has their eye on Pakistan, they would love to invade, but why? See below…

Third tip-off: “President George Bush welcomed the report”

Of course he did. If they can invade pakistan, Bush and his cronies can a) make a shitload of money on war munitions (Boeing, Lockheed, Defense Contractors), rebuilding (Halliburton, Carlyle), hired mercenaries (Blackwater) just like they did in Iraq, b) gain control of the countries State-owned enterprises and resources. Such as (YOU GUESSED IT!) OIL!. Pakistan is a modest producer of oil and we all know the US is oil hungry. The state-owned Oil and Gas Development Corporation (OGDC) that produces a lot of Pakistans oil could be up for grabs, as could Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. (PPL), which produces most of the countries natural gas.

I bet they already tried to corrupt and bribe the president of Pakistan into selling their companies and resources to US companies but he said no, so now they’re going to go in there to take them by force.

Fourth tip-off: “The target could be the US or some other part of the world.” “a biological or nuclear attack within the next five years was not inevitable”

These sentences are slightly confusing, and non-defining. They don’t want to set anything in stone. First they says “predicts nuclear or biological attack by 2013″ then says that it’s not inevitable. So if inevitable means it is definitely going to happen, that statement means it is definitely not going to happen.

I just hope the US Govt doesn’t decide to invade and fuck up Pakistan like they did Afghanistan and Iraq.