Right… so I was watching a documentary the other night on 911 by the National Geographic, and I have to say I have re-thought some aspects of the whole “conspiracy”.
I’m the guy with “911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB” written across the back of his van, and to be honest, I have had more nods of agreement/thumbs up etc, than I’ve had people look at me and shake their heads or whatever. But more often than not people do nothing.
I don’t actually believe anything definite anymore. I can only guess because I don’t actually know and I am on the other side of the world. Sure I watched Loose Change and agreed with some things but the problem is people go nuts at conspiracy theorists because they have a big conspiracy theory story of how it all played out when there is no way anyone can actually know what happened (especially The 9/11 Commission with their limited funding, limited access and lack of subpoena power).
What I do believe is that there are lots of fishy things surrounding the events of 911. But I’m no longer going to try to make up a story. I’m just going to look at all the things that don’t add up and go “Hmmm, thats a bit fishy. Someone should look into this,” and inform people about the things that don’t add up.
So, here is a couple of things that ARE fishy about 911, sans-conspiracy theories.
- Where did the molten metal underneath the Towers come from?
- Why did the 911 Commission only get $12m for the investigation (compared to $65m for Clintons blowjob investigation)
- Why didn’t the 911 Commission have subpoena power?
- Why were there reports of explosions coming from beneath the towers, after the planes hit?
- Why have no other skyscrapers in the history of mankind collapsed from fire?
- Why do they say jet fuel burns really hot and melted the steel when we saw a crapload of jetfuel explode OUTSIDE the buildings?
- If the floors in the WTC “pancaked” on top of each other like they said, causing the collapse, how come the center column isn’t still standing?
- What are the chances of three skyscrapers of two different construction types (WTC1+2 & WTC7), all collapsing from fires on the same day?
- If there was no jetfuel in WTC7, and burning jetfuel is what actually bought the twin towers down, what made WTC7 collapse?
- Why is there no wreckage from United 93 in the field in Pensylvania?
- Why was the video footage of the pentagon crash confiscated when video footage of the twin towers was allowed?
Thats all I have for now. I think there are enough questions out there however to warrant a new investigation into the events to answer the questions that the public wants to know. Who disagrees?